It’s all in there. All of it. Little Richard wasn’t an architect, or a pioneer or a tastemaker — he was Rock n Roll, because before Rock n Roll, there wasn’t any place for Little Richard to exist.
Richard wasn’t the first to record what we now know as Rock n Roll — I’m not getting into the argument about whether that was Rock Me or Roll ’em Pete, or whatever, not today — some form of which had been bubbling away beneath the notice of mass culture for decades, at raucous parties and clubs across the South spreading to Chicago and Kansas, where blues and jazz artists — many of them queer black women, who are only beginning to get their credit — got quicker and looser and improvised bawdy, funny songs.
But more than any other artist of his era, he was the embodiment of the joys and conflict at the heart of the genre, and perhaps the first to capture that on record. His truly essential work probably clocks in at less than an hour collectively and he barely scraped the charts after 1958, and yet in his work, aesthetic and story there is the blueprint for more or less every significant development of the genre — and it’s countless offshoots — for the next 40 years.
Born Richard Penniman in 1932 in Macon, Georgia, a feminine kid, bullied at school for only playing with girls, beaten at home for wearing his mother’s makeup and clothes, he was eventually kicked out of home at 15.
By this time, he’d already opened a show for the colossal Sister Rosetta Tharpe. The idea of her discovering him, singing her gospel songs, and offering him a gig — surely not knowing that she was kicking a genre she had helped pioneer a step further toward being the defining culture of the post-war world — is so vertiginous as to defy belief.
From there he found his way to Rock n Roll via drag, burlesque and vaudeville.
Later, he used this femininity — wearing make up and teasing his hair into a monumental pompadour — as a way to lessen his threat to the white audiences whose children were being driven insane by his music. He would later say: “I wore the make-up so that white men wouldn’t think I was after the white girls. It made things easier for me, plus it was colorful too.”
He was a teetotal in 1960 and hooked on PCP by 1975. He went back and forth to the Church in various official and born again capacities for decades. He veered between gay, bisexual, omnisexual, prurient and puritan — though I can’t find one instance of him identifiying as straight — right up to 2017.
I suspect his desires — not to mention his endless array of self-conceptions — and the tensions between them is why the music is still so wild. Bill Haley, Fats Domino, Chubby Checker, even Rocket 88 all tend drift politely into the background if you’re not looking directly at them. Little Richard’s wide eyed, hoarse wail, that playing style of beating the instrument into submission, that booming, driving beat, that barely concealed transgressive sexuality — just look up the original lyrics to Tutti Frutti — offers no such respite.
He’s outlived by Jerry Lee Lewis, but in his contradictions his influence will resonate a lot longer.
The conflict between excess and the yearning for salvation of one kind or another resonates most obviously in Prince, and peak era Rolling Stones but also The Weeknd, Childish Gambino and a million other lesser beings.
That desperate howl you hear echoed in every era, through Lennon and McCartney, through Lydon, Smith, Cobain, and Harvey, The Stooges, The New York Dolls, a hundred proto-Metal bands.
Voice as rhythmic component more than melodic gives you James Brown and funk, and gets you a long way towards hip hop. Just listen to that gospel tinged, loose-limbed take on Good Night Irene from 1964.
The flamboyance, and in particular gender as performance and plaything,gets you to Bowie, Bolan, Lady Gaga, Reed, Madonna, Prince again, Andre 3000, certain baseline ideas of what pop music is.
And from the sheer orgiastic thrill, the emancipatory fun of it all, you get more or less everything else worthwhile that rock had to offer.
In the mainstream understanding of reality — sexual, racial and economic — of the American south of the 1940s and 50s, there was no place for Little Richard to exist. And through music, he punched a hole in the air and created it.